Subject	Would have been even nicer if the graphs were the same scale
Posted by	KaZ (VaBch) on February 11, 2004 at 10:03 AM
	This message has been viewed 44 times.
In Reply To	Someone asked us for a dyno comparison between stock posted by John@Z1 on February 11, 2004 at 09:58 AM
Message	but being that they're not its a lot harder to eyeball the gains... granted there is a gain... but the area under the curve is harder to read without actually calculating it... =( Graphs with the same scales would work wonders. KaZ (VaBch) - "Unique Z" '84 S12 CA18ET T28 Hatchback '91 Z32 VG30DETT Fairlady Z - Version S '91 Z32 [ Missing ] Fairlady Z - Version S (Project Z 4 Sale!) '97 A32 VQ30DE Maxima SE AIM - KaZsMiR / E-mail @ Hotmail - casimijg Free Carfax Until 2/18/04! "Forumers are like economists: They state the obvious, give bad advice, and simply can't agree with each other." - Someone Else Need Some Z Work Done? Mechanic For Hire VA/DC/MD/NC -=* $300 60k/TBelt Special *=- -=< OR >=- Need Some Z Performance Parts? I've got a crapload for sale! Click Here To See What's Left!
Follow Ups	Someone asked us for a dyno comparison between stock - John@Z1 09:58:38 02/11/04 Would have been even nicer if the graphs were the same scale - KaZ (VaBch) 10:03:50 02/11/04 Exactly what I was thinking, maybe even the same graph - Japocalipse 10:05:53 02/11/04 yea, but that would make sense. - genic 10:07:58 02/11/04 *invent (n/m) - Stealth021 11:07:16 02/11/04 *write (n/m) - mongoozTT 11:21:00 02/11/04 i've never seen such bitches - joel(PA) 11:56:43 02/11/04 Yeah lots, wanna list? (n/m) - KaZ (VaBch) 12:23:47 02/11/04 Or even if they were on the same kind of dyno.... (n/m) - Lordrandall 10:23:54 02/11/04 Why does the first chart say max torque of 384, yet the - bb300z(NoVA) 10:21:20 02/11/04 opps. Meant 300. (n/m) - bb300z(NoVA) 10:32:53 02/11/04 You are looking at the power curve. But there is a problem - Russell@Z1 10:51:57 02/11/04 Thanks Russell. That looks much better. (n/m) - bb300z(NoVA) 10:56:11 02/11/04 So a correct comparison would be >>> - KaZ (VaBch) 11:05:51 02/11/04 no (n/m) - alcky 12:50:17 02/11/04 What do you mean no? (n/m) - KaZ (VaBch) 14:00:00 02/11/04 ;-) (n/m) - RegalZ 11:45:21 02/11/04 it would be nice if they where at the same dyno. - Halo Z 12:03:01 02/11/04 Take this for what it's worth: - Marshall 12:09:57 02/11/04 Thanks man! (n/m) - John@Z1 12:26:55 02/11/04 sure is odd anytime someone makes a hp claim, ppl call - takirb 12:15:33 02/11/04 who designed these cam profiles? sunbelt? - aliaZ 12:26:01 02/11/04 " qualified? " I find it funny too. - ZBlacktt 13:25:47 02/11/04 It's a legitimate question - aliaZ 14:20:18 02/11/04 fwiw - aliaZ 14:52:51 02/11/04 fwiw - ZBlacktt 15:15:30 02/11/04 Re: " qualified? " I find it funny too. - Velox 21:05:35 02/11/04 agreed (n/m) - aliaZ 21:40:34 02/11/04 True, but their facts hold record - ZBlacktt 03:41:21 02/12/04 that is besides the point (n/m) - aliaZ 07:54:48 02/12/04 Hmmm, A few questions - Good2Zya 12:39:20 02/11/04 Both runs were on a dynojet and SAE corrected - Russell@Z1 21:50:34 02/11/04 thanks. Is there a core charge on these? (n/m) - aliaZ 14:50:53 02/11/04 I don't represent Z1, but I wouldn't think so. I'd think - NC_Z 15:57:05 02/11/04 were the cams the *only* change made? - aliaZ 21:40:02 02/11/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.